PUBLICATIONS circle 19 Aug 2024

Buy Now Pay Later contracts - Regulatory response to Financial Innovation in the credit sector

By Michael Bracken

Under proposed new legislation, buy now, pay later contracts will be regulated as low cost credit contracts and BNPL providers will require an Australian Credit Licence.


In brief

Under proposed new legislation, buy now, pay later contracts (BNPL) will be regulated as low cost credit contracts (LCCCs) and BNPL providers will require an Australian Credit Licence and be subject to responsible lending obligations, disclosure requirements and fee restrictions.

Background

The Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (Bill) was introduced into Parliament on 5 June 2024 and is currently before the Senate.
 
Schedule 2 to the Bill will introduce amendments to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Credit Act) to extend the application of the Credit Code to BNPL and establish LCCCs as a new category of regulated credit.

The BNPL model

Developments in digital technology have enabled credit businesses to build a profitable market for low cost credit and credit-like arrangements.
 
Generally the BNPL model is a digital credit innovation involving third‑party merchant finance which operates as follows:

  • A third-party provides consumer finance to cover purchases of goods and services and the payment of bills.

  • BNPL consumers generally pay no interest for the finance (or otherwise a small fee).

  • BNPL products facilitate general retail purchasing up to a spending limit of $2,000 or less.

  • BNPL providers:

    • do not provide cash to consumers

    • have a contract between the BNPL provider and the consumer for the provision of credit in relation to the transaction

    • directly or indirectly pay- the merchant the value of the purchase upfront (some or all of the price of goods or services purchased by a consumer) (less any merchant fee)

    • may charge merchants a service fee for accepting BNPL transactions

    • collect repayments from consumers in instalments.

BNPL arrangements are not currently regulated under the Credit Act as they tend to fall under the exemptions available to certain types of credit in the Credit Code, namely low cost continuing credit or low cost, short term credit products
 
As a consequence, BNPL contracts are not subject to responsible lending obligations (RLOs) or other Credit Act requirements, and providers do not need to hold an Australian Credit Licence.
 
The advantage to a consumer of a BNLP contract is that it allows consumers to spread their spending over a number of interest-free instalments and it is interest-free if the instalments are paid on time. Otherwise, late fees or interest may apply to missed payments, similar to a credit card.
 
BNPL schemes are accessible to consumers without a credit history or stable income and do not typically affect their credit scores. However, market evidence suggests that:

"Compared with traditional consumer credit, BNPL users are typically younger, with less education, more debt, lower credit scores and higher delinquency rates."; and
 
"imprudent spending or a poor understanding of BNPL terms can lead to overindebtedness." (BIS Quarterly Review 04 December 2023)

 As BNPL products are a convenient and flexible way to access credit without interest charges or credit checks they are popular among younger consumers
 
However, given that demographic, BNPL products also pose significant risks to consumers, such as overcommitment, late fees, debt stress and reduced access to other forms of credit.
 
Thus the underlying regulatory policy driving the Bill is a response to this risk by regulating BNPL arrangements and BNPL contracts.

The Proposed Changes

The legislative amendments establish a LCCC as a new category of regulated credit under the Credit Act. BNPL contracts will be regulated as a class of LCCC.

Fundamentally LCCCs are continuing or non-continuing credit contracts for providing credit to consumers on a low cost basis.

Their capture is achieved by disapplying the exemptions in subsections 6(1) and (5) and paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Credit Code.

If a credit contract falls within the definition of an LCCC but could also be characterised as a small amount credit contract or a medium amount credit contract for the purposes of the Credit Act, it is regulated as an LCCC only.

A BNPL arrangement is defined to capture an arrangement where the merchant is the initial lender, but the predominant amount of the credit is provided by another provider.

However, the new framework does not cover entities that merely accept BNPL products or are engaged in their promotion.

LCCC providers are required to hold and maintain an Australian Credit Licence and to comply with the relevant licensing requirements and licensee obligations under the Credit Act.

The table below sets out the scope of Credit Act and Credit Code obligations which will apply to a BNPL provider and contract classified as a LCCC.

Obligations which Apply to LCCC

Credit Act Obligations which do not apply to LCCC

Statutory Regulation

BNPL contracts will be classified as a LCCC
LCCCs will constitute the provision of credit to which the Credit Code applies.
Current exemptions in subsections 6(1) and (5) and paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Credit Code ['short term credit contract', ' small amount credit contract' and 'medium amount credit] will not apply and LCCCs are excluded from those definitions.

 

Licensing

LCCC providers are required to hold and maintain an Australian Credit Licence and comply with the relevant licensing requirements and licensee obligations

Credit representatives of LCCC providers are not required to meet requirements relating to sub-authorisation and associated obligations to report to ASIC, provide credit guides and join AFCA

Disclosure

Mandatory disclosure obligations relating to interest rates and charges only apply to LCCC providers that charge interest on the provision of credit.

Part 10 of the Credit Code, which deals with comparison rates, does not apply to LCCCs.
 
 

Responsible Lending

LCCC providers can elect to either be subject to the modified RLO framework or to comply with the existing RLO requirements in Divisions 1 to 4 of Part 3-2 of the Credit Act. The RLO will apply to existing and future customers.

Where the credit limit of an LCCC is $2,000 or less, the LCCC is presumed to meet the consumer’s requirements and objectives, as long as it was entered into during the period covered by the assessment.
The presumption does not apply to the other criteria of unsuitability in sections 131 and 133 of the Credit Act (whether the consumer will be unable to comply with their financial obligations under the contract, or could only comply with substantial hardship).

Unsuitability Test

The extent of the reasonable inquiries and verification required, upon which the unsuitability test is applied, will scale according to risk factors relating to the product design, target market and risk and harm mitigation arrangements.

LCCC providers will not be required to comply with the Reference Checking and Information Sharing Protocol.

RLOs require LCCC providers to:

  • comply with specific requirements, to be prescribed in regulations, before entering a new LCCC with a consumer; and

  • have a written policy (known as an unsuitability assessment policy) that sets out how the provider will comply with its obligations under the modified RLO framework and is formulated with regard to certain matters, is evidence-based and is regularly reviewed.

LCCC providers are not required to undertake a preliminary assessment prior to informing a consumer of their eligibility for a credit contract or credit limit increase. However, although an assessment is no longer required to be undertaken before an unconditional representation is made, such a representation is still susceptible to regulatory breach if it is misleading.

A credit limit under an LCCC may only be increased at the request of the debtor or with the debtor's written consent (regardless of whether or not it is continuing credit contract)

 

Civil Penalties

LCCC providers will be subject to existing civil and criminal penalties for breaches of the Credit Act

 

Next Steps for BNLP Providers

Under the new legislation a BNLP provider classified as a LCCC provider will be subject to the Credit Act and Credit Code.
 
As a consequence they must:

  • Hold an Australian Credit Licence. If they currently hold a licence then they will still need to apply for a variation of authority to authorise them to provide LCCCs.

  • Comply with licensing requirements.

  • Make an election to either be subject to the modified RLO framework or to comply with the existing RLO requirements.

  • Comply with disclosure requirements including pre-contractual disclosure and if applicable, mandatory disclosure obligations relating to interest rates and charges.

  • Implement policies and governance frameworks relating to the compliance with the unsuitability test including reasonable inquiries and verification required and introduction of an unsuitability assessment policy.

  • Review their sales process, systems and documents for compliance including increasing the credit limit and customer default procedures.

Given the inclusion of anti-avoidance prohibitions in the Bill it leaves limited options for current BNLP providers other than to adapt their business models and practices to meet the new regulatory standards and requirements.

We recommend that providers of low cost continuing credit or low cost, short term credit products undertake an early assessment of the impact of the above reforms and take steps to implement necessary changes to their operations, sales processes and governance infrastructure and frameworks to achieve an efficient and effective transition to the new credit regime.
 
We anticipate that the legislation is likely to commence this year and that it will include a transition period however the terms of such transition and the timing of the application to current BNPL operators for compliance is uncertain.
 
In forthcoming FS Insights we will examine the modified RLO framework and other tailored modifications of the new LCCC regime including anti-avoidance.

This is commentary published by Colin Biggers & Paisley for general information purposes only. This should not be relied on as specific advice. You should seek your own legal and other advice for any question, or for any specific situation or proposal, before making any final decision. The content also is subject to change. A person listed may not be admitted as a lawyer in all States and Territories. Colin Biggers & Paisley, Australia 2024

Stay connected

Connect with us to receive our latest insights.